Archive for the 'Standards & Assessments' Category

Regents Report — December 2017

December 17th, 2017 by Robert Lowry

The Council started something new last week — using Periscope to broadcast an update on issues in the news. Council Executive Director Charles Dedrick, Assistant Director Greg Berck and I discussed actions taken at the December meeting of the Board of Regents this past Monday and Tuesday.

You can watch the 10-minute video here. We plan on doing these videos on a regular basis going forward.

Below is a further report on some of the actions taken or discussed by the Regents last week, co-written by Greg and me. The full agenda and supporting materials can be found on the Regents website. To view agenda items, click on the committee name (e.g., P-12 Education). Read the rest of this entry »

Category: Finance, Legislation, Standards & Assessments, Teachers, Uncategorized | Comments Off on Regents Report — December 2017

Testing. Now What?

June 21st, 2017 by Robert Lowry

Reporters have asked me, “Do superintendents want students to take the state’s tests?” – specifically, the grades three through eight assessments in English language arts and mathematics.

My standard answer begins, “Superintendents want state tests that educators and families will see as having value for their students’ learning. If that happens, families will choose to have their children take the tests.”

Last week, the Board of Regents approved shortening the grades three through eight assessments from three days each to two. It’s a change the Council, individual superintendents, and many others in education have sought for years.

The Regents and State Education Department have now made a series of operational changes to the assessments which were widely requested:  shortening the time required for the tests, first the daily sessions and now the number of days; disclosing substantially more test questions; returning results to schools earlier.

All these actions are helpful in addressing concerns educators and parents have raised about the conduct of the tests.

Greater and more complicated questions of how to assure the tests have value mostly remain to be resolved. They begin with, what purposes do we aspire to have the tests serve, and can we construct tests that will soundly serve each of those purposes?

Read the rest of this entry »

Category: Standards & Assessments, Uncategorized | Comments Off on Testing. Now What?

What Leaders Think About the Common Core and State Assessments

November 22nd, 2015 by Robert Lowry

Here is the introduction to our latest report, What Leaders Think About the Common Core and State Assessments:

Virtually all of New York State’s school superintendents – 96 percent – report that controversies over state education policies have had a negative impact upon their schools.  That is one of the central findings in a survey conducted by the New York State Council of School Superintendents in August and early September, 2015.

By a wide margin, superintendents responding to the Council survey view the Common Core Learning Standards as having a positive impact on education:  79 percent see a positive impact from the English language arts standards; 77 percent report a positive impact from the standards for mathematics.  But an even larger majority of superintendents – 81 percent – favors at least some changes to the standards.  Only 5 percent endorse complete revision, however.

Most superintendents regard concerns over state testing, teacher evaluations, and linkage of the two as the primary sources of the controversies diverting energy and attention from teaching and learning.  So while changes to the standards are needed, that action alone would not resolve parent and public alarm about the direction of education in New York.

By a 70 percent to 20 percent margin, responding superintendents disagree that the grades 3 through 8 state assessments provide information useful for evaluating teachers.  They are divided over the value of those tests in gauging whether individual students are on a trajectory to meet high school graduation requirements:  46 percent agree; 41 percent disagree.

But in open-ended comments, many superintendents offer thoughtful explanations of how their schools have used state tests to identify gaps in their instructional programs, one of the original purposes of state testing.  By 61 to 28 percent, superintendents agree the tests yield information useful for that goal.

Looking back
State learning standards are not new, nor are state tests.

Standards serve to define what students should know, understand, and be able to do as they progress through school and to leave school with a diploma.  They are a foundation upon which curricula, instruction, and assessments are then built.  New York’s prior English language arts standards were adopted in 1996; the last mathematics standards were approved in 2005.

Similarly, New York has administered grades 3 through 8 state assessments since 2006, due to the federal No Child Left Behind Act, and had 4th and 8th grade assessments before that.  It has had Regents Examinations since 1865.  Yet deep conflict over testing did not begin until the 2012-13 school year.

Why?  What changed?

First, schools in New York did add tests to comply with state law and federal requirements to build student performance measures into teacher evaluation.

Launching Common Core-aligned grades 3 through 8 assessments in spring 2013 incited more controversy.  Reports were common that traditionally successful students struggled to finish the tests and students with disabilities simply gave up, some in tears.  Later, when scores were released, educators questioned whether the tests accurately measured students’ proficiency.

The simultaneous start of Common Core-aligned assessments and new teacher evaluations incorporating growth scores tied to those assessments in 2012-13 was doubly damaging.  First, it compounded stress for teachers, at once changing both what they were expected to teach and how their teaching would be evaluated.  Second, the massive compliance exercise of implementing the new evaluation system diverted superintendents from the leadership work of explaining “the why” behind the new standards to their communities.

Last, with more experience, more weaknesses in the standards themselves have been identified.

Looking ahead
Lamenting the impact of policy controversies on their schools, one superintendent wrote, “Terrible place to be put as a district:  between the state and the parents.”  Another asked, “Is it too late to get parents back on board?”

Superintendents responding to the Council’s survey are not unanimous in their appraisals of the value and impact of state education reforms.  But the findings do point to a way forward.

First, state standards and assessments are necessary.

New York’s constitution promises, “…a system of free common schools, wherein all the children of this state may be educated.”  Learning standards help define what all children must be offered by their schools if that promise is to be kept.  Our survey indicates most superintendents see the Common Core standards as promising, but not perfect.  They support some revisions to the standards, chiefly to address criticisms about developmental appropriateness in some grades, but not a complete overhaul.

But whether one favors adjustments or an overhaul, similar steps must follow.  If the Common Core were repealed today, what would teachers teach tomorrow?  Changes, great or small, will take time to thoughtfully design and carefully implement.

Traditionally, the state’s elementary and middle school assessments were used to evaluate strengths and weaknesses in general instructional programs, particularly their alignment with the expectations defined in state standards. That purpose remains necessary.  Ideally, the assessments should also indicate how well individual students are progressing and whether they are on track to meet graduation expectations.

Surveys of parents and students have revealed a willingness to support assessments – if it is clear they can help improve instruction.[1]   New York City teacher union president Michael Mulgrew said, “We can’t say let’s get rid of all tests. That’s a diagnostic we need. It’s like telling a carpenter we’re taking your tape measure away.”[2]

Open-ended comments submitted by superintendents reveal consensus on steps toward a better state assessment system.  Many of the recommendations are familiar and some are now underway:  shorten the tests, get more information back to schools and families faster, assure the involvement of New York educators in test development.  A few point to computer-based, adaptive testing as a pivotal reform, essential to shortening the tests, improving their timeliness, and generally strengthening their usefulness in improving instruction.  There is wide sentiment that the link between state tests and teacher evaluations must be suspended.

A forthcoming report will examine superintendent perceptions of the state’s teacher evaluation requirements.

Debates over matters of public policy are now so often inflamed and any leader who steps forward with solutions invites criticism.  Condemning is easier than consensus building.  But if nothing is ever good enough, nothing can change, and nothing will ever improve.

The report that follows summarizes perspectives of the professional school leaders who will be called to make whatever new policies finally emerge work for all the children they are intended to benefit.

[1] Make Assessment Matter. Northwest Evaluation Association, Apr. 2014. Web. 02 Nov. 2015.  Also, Student Testing in America’s Great City Schools: An Inventory and Preliminary Analysis. Council of Great City Schools, October 2015.
[2] “Mulgrew: It’s helpful to have a foe in City Hall, but better to have an ally.”  Chalkbeat New York, October 21, 2015.  Web.  5 Nov. 2015.

Category: Standards & Assessments | Comments Off on What Leaders Think About the Common Core and State Assessments

Pivotal day in state education policy debates

February 10th, 2014 by Robert Lowry

Today is a big day for state education policy.  As the Buffalo News explained in a Saturday article,

Educators and lawmakers will be closely watching the Board of Regents when it meets Monday to see if the state’s top education officials will bend to pressure from lawmakers and educators who have complained about the way the state has rolled out the new learning standards. The Regents are expected to put forth a plan in response to a litany of complaints raised by teachers and parents at a series of public forums late last year.

I’m quoted as observing,

I imagine the legislators would hope that the Regents would put forth some ideas that would take down the temperature, satisfy parents and people working in the schools.  I think the stakes are high for the Education Department in that sense. Read the rest of this entry »

Category: Legislation, Standards & Assessments, Teachers, Uncategorized | Comments Off on Pivotal day in state education policy debates

Message to the Regents: Listen to the field

January 14th, 2014 by Robert Lowry

Today we have a guest post on our blog, written by Neil O’Brien, president-elect of the Council and superintendent of the Port Byron School District in Cayuga County, west of Syracuse.  It appeared first as a message for residents and employees of his district. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect formal positions of the New York State Council of School Superintendents. Read the rest of this entry »

Category: Standards & Assessments, Teachers | Comments Off on Message to the Regents: Listen to the field

Home Room — January 8, 2014

January 8th, 2014 by Robert Lowry

In this post:  the State of the State, Common Core, tax freezes, consolidation… Read the rest of this entry »

Category: Finance, Legislation, Standards & Assessments | Comments Off on Home Room — January 8, 2014

Home Room — January 6, 2014

January 6th, 2014 by Robert Lowry

Could today be the day Governor Andrew Cuomo receives the final recommendations of his Education Reform Commission?

Read the rest of this entry »

Category: Finance, Politics, Standards & Assessments, Uncategorized | Comments Off on Home Room — January 6, 2014

Home Room — January 3, 2014

January 3rd, 2014 by Robert Lowry

Just a couple items today — on the waiver to to avoid double testing of middle school students in math, part of the state’s 2014-15 testing schedule, unspent Race to the Top funds, and another “best of 2013″ compilations.

Read the rest of this entry »

Category: Standards & Assessments | Comments Off on Home Room — January 3, 2014

Home Room — January 2, 2014

January 2nd, 2014 by Robert Lowry

Happy New Year!

One of my resolutions is to get back to writing regularly for our blog.

Some items in the news over the past week or so… Read the rest of this entry »

Category: Finance, Leadership, Legislation, Politics, Standards & Assessments, State Budget | Comments Off on Home Room — January 2, 2014

Too much testing

October 7th, 2013 by Robert Lowry


Last week, roughly  2,500 Western New York parents, educators and others came out for a forum on the impact of testing in our schools.  The Buffalo News reported,

“Reform of high-stakes testing for schoolchildren, a groundswell movement of lawn signs and small-scale protests, became an earthquake Wednesday evening.”

At the Council’s fall conference last month, Rockville Centre superintendent Bill Johnson warned State Education Commissioner John King that the testing “opt-out” movement is growing.  He stressed, “This is different,” explaining the participants are more thoughtful and better organized than critics of the past.

Reporting on a State Senate Education Committee hearing, Newsday wrote,

“Emotions ran high Tuesday at a Long Island public hearing on state tests and related school issues as a procession of parents, teachers and others assailed what they described as Albany’s overemphasis on student assessments.”

Testifying at the Senate’s Syracuse hearing, a statewide PTA leader said,

 “If you ask our members (and we have), our concerns aren’t based so much on a fear of instructional change, but with a perception that we have become obsessed with student testing, with preparation for tests and with the use of test results for purposes never intended by their designers.”

I like to say it’s hard to get the right answers if you’re asking the wrong questions.  Also, we often overlook the simple question, “Why?”

Why is this happening now?  What has changed in recent years to cause discontent over student testing to swell?

Read the rest of this entry »

Category: Standards & Assessments, Teachers | Comments Off on Too much testing